Hi,
Sometimes we receive some patches with a strange character in
a header "Received:" so the patch is not parsed in patchwork.
I have not yet investigated where the script is failing,
but I just want to ask first if there is a work in progress
about this issue?
And could it be fixed by removing
Hi Thomas,
> Sometimes we receive some patches with a strange character in
> a header "Received:" so the patch is not parsed in patchwork.
> I have not yet investigated where the script is failing,
> but I just want to ask first if there is a work in progress
> about this issue?
> And could it be
On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 08:51 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> Once I know more, I'll come back here with that info and check the
> code again as well.
>
So it's running v1.0.0 (*), which as a notable difference doesn't
actually generate a browser redirect but just generates the list
inline, which
> Hmm. I wonder if this has an impact on my todo-list issue as well?
>
> Perhaps you have an easy way to check that? I don't actually have a
> local setup right now :(
>
I was going to have a look shortly. I haven't actually played with to-do
lists before, but the same tools I used to find this
Hi again,
> This series causes a > 2x jump in the number of SQL queries required to
> display the front page. With my test of some emails from the patchwork
> mailing list, it goes from 73 queries on master to 182 queries, and the
> time spent in SQL also more than doubles.
>
> That's highly
