M’Afrika Moloto,

It is always interesting to hear from elder members of your caliber on PAYCO
platform. As young cadres of the party I hope we are still going to learn a
lot and we hope you are not going to mislead us one way or the other.

Your stance on party building seems to be cut in stone and it’s not open for
the very same party members you are trying to unite engage on it and to me
that amount to sheer arrogance. Your argument on the so called Alice
Congress resembles the thinking of someone who is trying to bury his head in
the sand and ignore clear party principles. You talk about PAC branches
those who were in good standing? Maybe we do not have the same understanding
of good standing as per the PAC constitution.

 From which constitution were those branches running their affairs from,
since there was a rule by decree prior Alice? We all know that the
constitution was suspended and there was a rule by decree which till to date
is still not justified. I would like you to answer few questions here:

1.     How can branches exist if there is no constitution?

2.     The branches you are talking about are you talking about the man who
was ruling by decree?

3.     How do you submit amendments to the constitution if the party is a
one man show (Rule by decree)?

4.     How do you amend a suspended constitution?

5.     You talk as head of party building; do we have such a position in the
PAC constitution?

I will be very glad if you can be able to clarify me on these issues.

Logic will tell that you first reinstate the suspended constitution and then
the party returns to constitutionality; it is then that you can allow
branches to engage on sections of the constitution to be amended.

Your attack on PAYCO is uncalled for, ridiculous and absurd, it clearly
shows that you were observing events of the party from the sidelines. PAYCO
remains the only organized component structure of the PAC. PAYCO is the only
structure that reminds people that there is the PAC, in simple terms we are
responsible for keeping the ship of the PAC afloat. As PAYCO we took a
principled stance to support Letlapa Mphahlele’s candidacy and presidency,
unless you want to deny this.

PAYCO supported Letlapa's candidacy on the basis that as president, together
with the leadership collective would tackle the ruling party and make the
party more visible in the national political landscape. Because it is only
when you are visible you can get the numbers in our country’s system of
elections and governance. He agreed that he would adopt a combative approach
towards the ruling party. PAYCO expected him to come with a revolutionary
programme of action which would keep members of the party focused on mass
struggles. PAYCO expected him to support all component structures of the
party to effectively fulfill their roles in the party. To our amusement this
was contrary!!!

He was and still not prepared to speak against the ruling party till today.
The last time we heard his voice it was when he was regretting the death of
ET. He made factionalism in the party the order of the day. He pulled every
trick in his book to refused and obstructed the NEC from coming up with
programme of action, policy documents nor a single strategic document.
Unless you can show us such. He never had anything to do with component
structures, to him they were useless. PAYCO tried to be patient with him, we
even arranged a meeting with him to let him know how we feel, but that did
not yield any good results for the party. It was against this background
that we withdraw our principled support for him and called on him to step
down because it was then clear to us that we have been hoodwinked to support
a candidate who was in a mission to cripple the party.

I would like to agree with you we you say that “Gone are the days when
individuals are picked from the street to lead the PAC structures.” Unless
you forgot that Letlapa is one of them.

The biggest lesson we learned with the Letlapa experience is that we must
never again go and pick people from the street and allow them to lead the
PAC again.
In a revolutionary party like the PAC with genuine leadership, the centre
must hold, if not everything falls apart and truly speaking the center is
not holding at the moment and you know why. PAYCO firmly believes that it’s
just a matter of time until members of the PAC returns be party to normality
and the center holds. The days of people holding the party at ransom are
really numbered.
Izwe Lethu!!!
Lucky Khoza
PAYCO Secretary General






On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Narius Moloto <g...@bcawu.co.za> wrote:

>  In the party building of the pac we agree with you.we spent lot of our
> enegy negatively either agaist each other or the party leadership.we
> continue to waiste our energy other than focusing on what must be done to
> rebuild the party.the party programme at the moment is to build party
> branches in every section or zone of our townships,suburburn and villages of
> our country.to mobilise our youth and focus them on youth issues.the same
> to our workers,atudents and women.we know what need to be done we must just
> to it.everybody must have learned by now that attacking each other get us
> nowhere.
>
>
>
> *From:* payco@googlegroups.com [mailto:pa...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Phakamile Myakayaka
> *Sent:* 28 May 2010 11:03 AM
>
> *To:* payco@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [PAYCO] PAYCO VS PACyl ON SA FM
>
>
>
> majoni ikhona ingxaki kwaye it is of gigantic propotion.i just listened to
> safm and i am not happy at all.solution:let's all meet and iron our
> differences in order to move forward as a strong force of african warriors
> on  a revolutionary march to total emancipation of amaAfrica, uPAYCO
>  makakhokhele i'm ready to loose blood for the african course IZWE LETHU!
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:49 AM, <sp...@webmail.co.za> wrote:
>
> I fully agree with you son there's no reason for us go public b'cause we
> are still denting our own image.But as I said the other day certain
> comrades in a road to score points
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> South Africa's premier free email service - www.webmail.co.za
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> For super low premiums, click here http://home.webmail.co.za/dd.pwm
>
>
> --
> Sending your posting to payco@googlegroups.com
>
> Unsubscribe by sending an email to payco-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>
> You can also visit http://groups.google.com/group/payco
>
> Visit our website at www.mayihlome.wordpress.com
>
>
>
> --
> Sending your posting to payco@googlegroups.com
>
> Unsubscribe by sending an email to payco-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>
> You can also visit http://groups.google.com/group/payco
>
> Visit our website at www.mayihlome.wordpress.com
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2899 - Release Date: 05/27/10
> 20:30:00
>
> --
>  Sending your posting to payco@googlegroups.com
>
> Unsubscribe by sending an email to payco-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>
> You can also visit http://groups.google.com/group/payco
>
> Visit our website at www.mayihlome.wordpress.com
>

-- 
Sending your posting to payco@googlegroups.com

Unsubscribe by sending an email to payco-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

You can also visit http://groups.google.com/group/payco

Visit our website at www.mayihlome.wordpress.com

Reply via email to