Re: MP3 Is Dead!

Does this now mean that new recorders and recording software will not offer mp3 anymore? Or will they make it open sorce for use with open sorce software? On 17/05/2017, Hamit Campos wrote: > Yeah and in all honesty the MP3 incoder of the LS-14 is pretty good. > Like I

Re: MP3 Is Dead!

Yeah and in all honesty the MP3 incoder of the LS-14 is pretty good. Like I said before I think I'm just jaded because of the PTR1 and 2 then the MileStone 311. On 5/17/2017 1:40 PM, Byron Stephens wrote: I've been doing my cd, vinyl and tape rips all at 320k-bit, and hear nothing wrong.

Re: MP3 Is Dead!

I've been doing my cd, vinyl and tape rips all at 320k-bit, and hear nothing wrong. Quite offen some transcode their stuff making it look like it's been done at 320k-bit, but it's artificial. I'll continue to use the format until suddenly it magicly stops working, but that will happen when john

Re: MP3 Is Dead!

Ah than saddly I guess I am an audio snob then. lol I can hear the mp3ness to some MP3s. Fair though some are better than others. But meh I prefer PCM WAV thanks. lol Na but maybe the matalicness of the PTR incoder jaded me like I said before. On 5/17/2017 1:30 PM, Chris Skarstad wrote:

Re: MP3 Is Dead!

Geez, such negativity around here! There is nothing in the world wrong with a 320 k mp3 at 44.1 khz stereo. Listen on a good set of speakers and you will see. Not as good as a lossless file for sure, but unless you're an audio snob, there's nothing wrong with it. and now that the

Re: MP3 Is Dead!

Yip yip yip yip yahoo like Rush Limbaw says. I love it. Yeah I was never a big fan of MP3. But maybe the PTR1's yucky 64 KBPS MP3 jaded me. On 5/16/2017 6:14 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote: Yep subject line says everything, the format is dead and no new licences will be issued to continue