Am 21.03.2013 17:48, schrieb francis picabia:
The strange thing is, I had this misplaced optimism that Ian Murdock
would fix Sun's wacky series of patch tools with something fast and
robust like dpkg or pkg-get. I was totally wrong.
To be fair, they kind of did that in Solaris 11 (IPS/pkg).
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013, francis picabia wrote:
; On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Martin Paul martin.p...@univie.ac.at wrote:
; Am 21.03.2013 17:48, schrieb francis picabia:
;
; The strange thing is, I had this misplaced optimism that Ian Murdock
; would fix Sun's wacky series of patch tools
Solaris 11 is a much better alternative for a number of reasons. I work for
a large organization that has 1000's of Redhat / Suse linux servers.
Managing them is a mess, yes they are easier to patch yum update etc.. but
with Solaris 11 you have pkg update? It couldn't be easier.
Suse and redhat
I wouldn't go so far as to call Linux junk, but I certainly understand the
difference between Solaris and Linux. The big thing folks have to understand
with Linux is that you don't run one big, reliable box. You run scores of
smaller machines, usually virtual, and have it so scaled out that you
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jeremy Loukinas sunad...@gmail.com wrote:
Solaris 11 is a much better alternative for a number of reasons. I work for
a large organization that has 1000's of Redhat / Suse linux servers.
Managing them is a mess, yes they are easier to patch yum update etc.. but
I also have redhatadmin@ if that helps.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:19 PM, francis picabia fpica...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jeremy Loukinas sunad...@gmail.com
wrote:
Solaris 11 is a much better alternative for a number of reasons. I work
for
a large organization
We pay less than $200 per Dell for annual hardware maintenance. Oracle is
$1000 per server for hardware maintenance. We pay $60/year for Redhat update
access (for University). Same update access plus support from Oracle is
another $1000/year. There is no option for only software updates
Patches are free for Sol x86 if you use Sun / Oracle hardware, no license
cost.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Lee, Jarrett jarrett@cedarcrestone.com
wrote:
We pay less than $200 per Dell for annual hardware maintenance. Oracle
is $1000 per server for hardware maintenance. We pay
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Lee, Jarrett
jarrett@cedarcrestone.com wrote:
We pay less than $200 per Dell for annual hardware maintenance. Oracle is
$1000 per server for hardware maintenance. We pay $60/year for Redhat update
access (for University). Same update access plus support
We pay less than $200 per Dell for annual hardware maintenance. Oracle is
$1000 per server for hardware maintenance. We pay $60/year for Redhat update
access (for University). Same update access plus support from Oracle is
another $1000/year. There is no option for only software updates
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Jeremy Loukinas sunad...@gmail.com wrote:
Patches are free for Sol x86 if you use Sun / Oracle hardware, no license
cost.
I see only one license agreement for Sol 10/11 x86/sparc download page
and it does not refer to x86 in the agreement.
Patches are free for Sol x86 if you use Sun / Oracle hardware, no license
cost.
Only if you have said hardware under Premier Support...
--
cat /dev/null SCO Group
On Sat, March 23, 2013 5:28 am, Lee, Jarrett wrote:
We pay less than $200 per Dell for annual hardware maintenance. Oracle
is $1000 per server for hardware maintenance. We pay $60/year for Redhat
update access (for University). Same update access plus support from
Oracle is another
13 matches
Mail list logo
