El 21/06/2013 18:16, Ina Minei escribió:
In light of the recent working group re-charter which now includes
stateful PCE, we wanted to hear the opinions of the group on
1. the need for an applicability document for stateful PCE and
2. whether draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app satisfies this
Hi all,
Definitely, Yes for both.
Best Regards
Fatai
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP
Vasseur (jvasseur)
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 4:20 PM
To: Ina Minei; pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability
Thanks Ina - good question :
As a contributing author, I believe there is a need for an applicability
document.
I think this document covers the topic well enough and I'm not aware of
any huge gaps.
Thanks,
Robert
On 06/21/2013 06:16 PM, Ina Minei wrote:
Dear chairs and working group,
In light of the recent working
Hi-
Yes, I see a need for applicability doc.
Thanks
Regards … Zafar
From: JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.commailto:jvass...@cisco.com
Date: Saturday, June 22, 2013 4:19 AM
To: Ina Minei i...@juniper.netmailto:i...@juniper.net,
pce@ietf.orgmailto:pce@ietf.org
Hi PCErs,
I think it is key to have a document about the stateful PCE applicability, so
the rationale behind stateful and active PCE is well understood. Let me point
out that I also speak as a contributing author, so I am biased..
The applicability draft documents a set of use cases considered
Hi,
I support the idea of the need for Stateful PCE applicability. As stated in the
latest draft, this document is pivotal in providing an overarching stateful PCE
applicability to various scenarios. This draft should have preceded any other
stateful PCE related drafts, but it is not too late
