All,
As elaborated in [1] (see option c)
1. _Object Ordering_
Unfortunately RFC5440 does not mention anything regarding sub-object
ordering, it only says to specify that the computed path MUST traverse
a set of specified network elements and does not include some text in
the
On 03/04/2014 10:32 AM, Ramon Casellas wrote:
All,
As elaborated in [1] (see option c)
Err, I meant b). The motivations were mainly:
1. _Object Ordering_
2. _Different Scopes_
3. _Limited Procedures_
4. _Strict vs Loose_
R.
___
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had good support for
adopting draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as a WG
document, as usual, we would like to confirm on the mailing list.
Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of adopting
draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02
Support (as a co-author)
Regards,
Dhruv
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:47 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.comwrote:
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had good support for
adopting draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as a WG
document, as usual, we would like to confirm
Support
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
Sent: 04 March 2014 15:18
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ?
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had
support
On 03/04/2014 09:47 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) wrote:
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had good support for
adopting draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as a WG
document, as usual, we would like to confirm on the mailing list.
Would you be in favor/opposed (and why
Support (as you could expect...)
On 4 Mar 2014, at 09:47 , JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com wrote:
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had good support for
adopting draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as a WG
document, as usual, we would like to confirm on the
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had some support for
adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt
as a PCE WG.
Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of adopting
draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as a WG document
Support.
Brgds,DG.
I've had good seasons and some deeply painful ones. I've made some
spectacularly good choices and some outrageously bad mistakes. I'm very human -
a work in progress. - Robin Sharma.
~
On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 6:00 AM,
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 7150
Title: Conveying Vendor-Specific Constraints in the
Path Computation Element Communication Protocol
Author: F. Zhang, A. Farrel
Status:
Support!
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
Sent: 04 March 2014 15:18
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ?
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had
Hi-
Support (as a co-author).
Thanks
Regards Š Zafar
-Original Message-
From: JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com
Date: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 5:51 AM
To: pce@ietf.org pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt
as PCE WG Document ?
Support.
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
Sent: 04 March 2014 09:48
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ?
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had
Support (as co-author).
Best Regards,
Oscar
El 04/03/14 10:47, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com escribió:
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had good support
for adopting draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as a WG
document, as usual, we
Yes/support
Regards,
Jeff
On Mar 4, 2014, at 6:12 PM, Julien Meuric julien.meu...@orange.com wrote:
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today, we had some support for
adopting draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-01 as a PCE WG item.
Would you be in favor/opposed
Support (as a co-author)
Regards,
Dhruv
On Mar 4, 2014 6:28 PM, Jeff Tantsura jeff.tants...@ericsson.com wrote:
Yes/support
Regards,
Jeff
On Mar 4, 2014, at 6:12 PM, Julien Meuric julien.meu...@orange.com
wrote:
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today, we had some
Support
--
Likely to be brief and not very
elaborate as sent from my mobile
Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D
On 04 Mar 2014, at 18:12, Julien Meuric julien.meu...@orange.com wrote:
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today, we had some support for
adopting
Provided my feedback to one of the authors on this draft earlier.
This document should definitely not be experimental.
I fully support this.
--
Uma C.
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 1:48 AM
Support.
-邮件原件-
发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Julien Meuric
发送时间: 2014年3月5日 2:12
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG
Document?
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today, we had some support for adopting
Support.
-邮件原件-
发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Zafar Ali (zali)
发送时间: 2014年3月4日 22:22
收件人: JP Vasseur (jvasseur); pce@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as
PCE WG Document ?
Hi-
Support (as a co-author).
Thanks
Regards Š
Support.
Regards,
Xian
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
Sent: 2014年3月4日 17:48
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ?
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today
Support as co-author.
Regards,
Xian
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
Sent: 2014年3月5日 2:12
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE
WG Document?
Dear WG,
As discussed during the
Support
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
Sent: 04 March 2014 23:42
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE
WG Document?
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today, we
Support
On 3/4/14, 4:40 PM, Zhangxian (Xian) zhang.x...@huawei.com wrote:
Support (as co-author).
Regards,
Xian
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
Sent: 2014年3月4日 18:52
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of
Support
On 3/4/14, 7:35 PM, Avantika avantika.sushilku...@huawei.com wrote:
Support
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
Sent: 04 March 2014 23:42
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as
Yes, support
On Mar 5, 2014 5:53 AM, Dhruv Dhody dhruv.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Support.
On Mar 4, 2014 10:52 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com wrote:
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had some support for
adopting
26 matches
Mail list logo
