Yes/Support!
-Pavan (Co-Author)
*From:* Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Hardwick
> *Sent:* 28 June 2016 22:29
> *To:* pce@ietf.org
> *Cc:* draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [Pce] Poll for adoption:
Yes/support.
Young
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 11:59 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09
All,
I have submitted this draft to the IESG for publication. A copy of my shepherd
write-up is below FYI.
Best regards
Jon
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard,
Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)?
Proposed standard.
Why is this the proper
Hello Robert,
General comment: The proposal modifications has been written following
different interoperability tests done on different commercial solutions of both
PCE and PCC. The issue raised following these tests show that the draft has
been interpreted differently and thus, need to be
Hi Jon,
Done.
-11 is uploaded.
Thanks for the text and apologies for missing out on the first place.
Dhruv
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: 28 June 2016 21:06
To: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aw...@ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] IANA
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element of the IETF.
Title : Extensions to the Path Computation Element
Communication Protocol (PCEP) to compute service aware Label Switched Path
Yes/Support!
Regards,
Dhruv (co-author)
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: 28 June 2016 22:29
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09
The PCE WG has placed draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Jonathan Hardwick)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp/
___
Pce mailing list
All,
This is start of a two week poll on making draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09
a PCE working group document. This draft fills a gap in explaining how
stateful PCE can be applied to P2MP paths.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp/
Please review the
Hi there
In section 8.3, we need to specify more details for IANA to create the
requested sub-registry. I suggest the following new text. You'll also need to
add an informative reference to RFC 5226.
8.3. BU Object
This document requests that a new sub-registry, named "BU Object
Type
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Regards,
Xian
From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com]
Sent: 2016年6月28日 21:57
To: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-...@ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Last IPR check for
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft
Regards,
Dhruv
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: 28 June 2016 19:27
To: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-...@ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Last IPR check for
No, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Young
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 8:57 AM
To: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-...@ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Last IPR check for
Dear authors,
Please could you confirm (on the mailing list) whether you are aware of any IPR
that applies to draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app, and if so, if it has been
disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and
5378 for more details.) If you are not aware of
Hi there
I have reviewed this document as document shepherd. The document looks ready
to be published to me, with a few minor fixes to nits in the text, as I have
identified below.
The document has expired. Please could you make the mark-ups below and refresh
the document?
Many thanks
Jon
15 matches
Mail list logo
