Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

2017-01-05 Thread Aaron Itskovich
Hi Jon, Thanks for your reply. My interpretation of the following section of the existing draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp is that PCC cannot just re-delegate PCE initiated LSP to a PCE. In case of PCEP session failure, control over PCE-initiated LSPs reverts to the PCC at the

Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

2017-01-05 Thread Jonathan Hardwick
Hi Aaron Thanks for the comment. There are no procedures defined that would allow a PCE to initiate a take-over of an LSP from a PCC. Rather, the PCC must delegate the LSP to an appropriate PCE (if the LSP is initiated by a PCE then it must initially be delegated to that PCE). The cases you

[Pce] The PCE WG has placed draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2017-01-05 Thread IETF Secretariat
The PCE WG has placed draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Jonathan Hardwick) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth/ ___