Hi Girish,
(1)You are comparing two different things -
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09#section-8.3
is for bit inside the STATEFUL-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV i.e. bit no 26
where as
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-08#section-9.3
Dear Julien Meuric,
The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled.
Below is the scheduled session information followed by
the original request.
pce Session 1 (1:30:00)
Monday, Afternoon Session II 1520-1650
Room Name: Zurich G size: 115
Dear Authors,
Suggested TLV values conflict with in other PCE drafts. I could find 2
conflicts, there may be more. Is there a way the PCE WG can manage TLV
values across drafts? For compatibility between vendors and different
software release from same vendor - keeping these values unchanged is
