Re: [Pce] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2019-06-28 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Julien, On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 03:26:33PM +0200, julien.meu...@orange.com wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Apologies for the late response. I probably wouldn't have been able to reply much before now anyway -- I've been quite busy (and have some other documents' authors waiting for feedback as well).

[Pce] pce - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 105

2019-06-28 Thread "IETF Secretariat"
Dear Dhruv Dhody, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request. pce Session 1 (2:00 requested) Thursday, 25 July 2019, Morning Session I 1000-1200 Room Name: Centre Ville size: 200

[Pce] Shepherd Review of draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity-07

2019-06-28 Thread julien.meuric
Hi authors, Please find below my detailed comments on draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity. I originally started to review -06. Thanks for posting -07 after Dhruv's comments, as it addressed some on mine as well. The main technical concern lies in section 4.6, in case no solution is found by the

Re: [Pce] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2019-06-28 Thread julien.meuric
Hi Ben, Apologies for the late response. Let us focus on your first DISCUSS comment which is the main one. You raised a legitimate point that we acknowledge. After discussion, we propose to modify the end of section 2.4 as follows: OLD The semantic of the LOAD-BALANCING object is not