Yes/Support. I think such mechanism is necessary for the interoperation of SR and RSVP-TE, and can overcome some shortcomings of SR technology.
Aijun Wang. -----邮件原件----- 发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Dhruv Dhody 发送时间: 2019年8月21日 1:45 收件人: pce@ietf.org 抄送: pce-chairs 主题: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07 [1]. Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. One of the chairs did a pre-adoption review [2] and authors posted a new revision. Note that there are known implementations. This adoption poll will end on 6th September 2019. Thanks! Dhruv (for the chairs) [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07 [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/oaBIRA9FnNsV6-JrKKRCdwtLysk _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
