Hi WG,
Support as the co-author. Path Segment is the base for many usecases based on
SR such as OAM, bi-directional, etc. It has been well accepted.
PCE extensions will facilitate the deployment of Path Segment and the draft is
ready.
Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)
-Original
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.
Title : PCEP Extensions for MPLS-TE LSP Automatic Bandwidth
Adjustment with Stateful PCE
Authors : Dhruv
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.
Title : PCEP Extensions for Associating Working and
Protection LSPs with Stateful PCE
Authors : Hariharan
Hi Hari and WG,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)
From: Weiqiang Cheng [mailto:chengweiqi...@chinamobile.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 10:07 AM
To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ;
Hi WG,
Support as a co-author since the text of this draft is mature and ready for WG
adoption.
This document is being implemented by Huawei Product, and it will be used in
CMCC's SPN in the future.
Many thanks,
Cheng
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On
Hi,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in
accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Best regards,
Mach
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@netflix.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 1:49 AM
To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ; Mach Chen
;
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 01:56:46PM +0530, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thanks for the discussion.
>
> Snipping to open points..
>
> > > >
> > > > As a general note, I'm not sure the phrase "calculated bandwidth to be
> > > > adjusted" is a great fit for how it's currently being used.
> > >
Hi Hari and WG,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in
accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Quan
原始邮件
发件人：HariharanAnanthakrishnan
收件人：chengl...@huawei.com ;mach.c...@huawei.com
;chengweiqi...@chinamobile.com
;jie.d...@huawei.com
Hi,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to the draft.
B.R.
Weiqiang Cheng
发件人: Chengli (Cheng Li) [mailto:chengl...@huawei.com]
发送时间: 2019年9月26日 09:50
收件人: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan; Mach Chen; chengweiqi...@chinamobile.com;
Dongjie (Jimmy); Lizhenbin; rgan...@cisco.com;
Hi Hari and WG,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Cheng
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@netflix.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 1:49 AM
To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ; Mach Chen
;
Hi Dhruv,
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 07:36:43PM +0530, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 3:39 AM Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
> wrote:
> >
> > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-13:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:38:13AM +0530, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Apologies for the delay. I am replying this email where we tackle
> points that needed some more discussion.
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 2:32 AM Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dhruv,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at
Hi PCE WG,
In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there
for a little while, after it was discussed face to face. We would now
like you to voice your opinion on the list: do you think this I-D can be
the foundation for a PCE WG's work item?
Please send your feedback to
Hi Roman,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:08 PM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
wrote:
>
> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-11: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the discussion.
Snipping to open points..
> > >
> > > As a general note, I'm not sure the phrase "calculated bandwidth to be
> > > adjusted" is a great fit for how it's currently being used.
> > > Specifically, the "calculation" in question seems to just be taking the
> > >
15 matches
Mail list logo
