Support.
Thanks& Best Regard,
Fengwei Qin
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 12:21 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
Hi PCE WG,
In our
Hi Dhruv, Julien, et al.,
yes/support
I've read the draft and believe it is ready to be adopted by the PCE WG.
The draft proposes a much-needed solution to OAM in SR-MPLS.
Regards,
Greg
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:21 AM wrote:
> Hi PCE WG,
>
> In our adoption poll queue,
Yes/Support.
Aijun Wang
-邮件原件-
发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表
julien.meu...@orange.com
发送时间: 2019年9月26日 0:21
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
Hi PCE WG,
In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been
Hi,
Support (as co-author) the adoption!
Best regards,
Mach
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 12:21 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
Hi PCE WG,
Hi all,
I read this draft and support its adoption by WG because support of Path
Segment in PCE and ways of its allocation are important.
Also agree with earlier Rakesh comments in the list about extending normative
and informative reference sections by including those 2 drafts
Hi,
I (as a coauthor) support the adoption of this document. The PCEP extension
will facilitate the deployment of Path Segment.
Best regards,
Jie
> -Original Message-
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> julien.meu...@orange.com
> Sent: Thursday, September 26,
