Hi Authors,
In preparation for Working Group adoption on this draft, I'd like all
authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance
with IETF IPR rules.
Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that
The PCE WG has placed draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Julien Meuric)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path/
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
Hi all,
It is time to share your thoughts about draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06.
Do you believe the I-D is a right foundation for a PCE WG item? Please
use the PCE mailing list to express your comments, support or
disagreement, including applicable rationale, especially for the latter.
Thanks,
Hi all,
The I-D defining the IGP extensions to discover the PCEP security
capabilities was presented to the PCE WG during IETF 105. Please be
aware that it is progressing as an LSR WG document
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/1CqjNObC5hoZaKDMrVTGwO0Axd0)
and note particularly the agreed