Hi Hari,I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be
disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.Thanks,-Chao
On Thursday, November 26, 2020, 05:58:39 PM EST, Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
wrote:
Hi Authors,
In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all
Hi PCE,
This document specifies the SR-MPLS extensions based on PCECC base draft, and
also a long document. Many thanks for authors.
I think making PCE as a center controller is useful in SR-MPLS scenarios, and
CCI object is a good idea. Therefore I support the adoption.
Thanks,
Cheng
Hi Authors,
In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all
authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance
with IETF IPR rules.
Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be
The PCE WG has placed draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Julien Meuric)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr/
Hi all,
PCECC extensions are progressing towards the IESG. It is time to share
your thoughts about draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-09.
Do you believe the I-D is a right foundation for a PCE WG item? Please
use the PCE mailing list to express your comments, support or
disagreement,
