Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04

2021-01-11 Thread olivier.dugeon
Hello Adrian, Thanks a lot for your thorough review and your suggestion. We'll incorporate all of them. I just have a comment about the text with the proposed figure: as it describe the Backward Recursive method, I think it will preferable inverse order of explanation for point 3 i.e. start by

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04

2021-01-11 Thread Boris Khasanov
Hi Dhruv and all, Happy New Year too! Thanks a lot for reminding. I support this draft. I like Stitching Label approach and especially, in case of SR, the link towards EPE ( PeerNode/PeerAdj SIDs). SY, Boris -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Friday, January 8

[Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04

2021-01-11 Thread Zhenghaomian
Yes, Support. This draft is proposing the approach for segment stitching, which is especially useful in cross-technology scenarios. It is possible in inter-domain case that one domain BN acts as PCC, and trigger the LSP establishment in the other technology domain (acting as PCE) with PCInitia