[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF. Title : Carrying Binding Label/Segment-ID in PCE-based Networks. Authors : Siva Sivabalan

Re: [Pce] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-12: (with COMMENT)

Thank you Murray for the review comments. We have posted a new revision that address the comments: URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13.txt Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13 Please see inline

Re: [Pce] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-12: (with COMMENT)

Thank you Benjamin for the review comments. We have posted a new revision that address the comments: URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13.txt Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13 Please see inline

Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-12: (with COMMENT)

Thank you Alvaro for the review comments. We have added a Section 3.5 - Operational Considerations in the new revision to address the comment. URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13.txt Diff:

Re: [Pce] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-12: (with COMMENT)

Thank you Eric for the review comments. We have posted a new revision that address the comments: URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13.txt Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13 Please see inline with

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF. Title : Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Associated Bidirectional Label Switched

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03

Ah, that's useful. Thanks Julien. Makes this work more pressing. Informative references to those two drafts would help focus the reviewer's mind and might be handy when this draft overtakes those other two documents and goes to the IESG. Cheers, Adrian -Original Message- From:

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03

Hi Dhruv, I support adoption of this draft. Regards, Samuel From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 12:28 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Hi WG, We *need* to hear from more of you before taking a call on adoption. It

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03

Hi, I support this draft. Regards Olivier Le 16/02/2021 à 12:28, Dhruv Dhody a écrit : > Hi WG, > > We *need* to hear from more of you before taking a call on adoption. It is a > straightforward "house-keeping" document, but we need to see explicit > expressions of support (and comments). >

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03

Hi Adrian, Thank you for your feedback. If evidence is needed, how about binding label? https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-06#section-11.2 Note it's also reused in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-sr-path-segment-03#section-4.2 Have a nice week-end, Julien

Re: [Pce] Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp

From: julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: 18 February 2021 10:35 Hi Tom, Thank you for your valuable feedback. Some of the issues you point out are easy to address and we've already requested the authors to revise the I-D accordingly. To fully resolve your concern, could you please point any other