Hi,
Also as a telco, we are expecting the implementation of PCEP-LS, and once it is
ready, we will try to deploy it in the network.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of ???(Naas
Transformation ?)
Sent: Friday, April 2, 2021 9:14 AM
To: Gy
Dear Gyan,
As a telco, we are interested in the upgrade of PCEP.
PCEP and H-PCE scenarios is always being considered as valuable tools for
solving our issues in telco’s multi-domain environment.
Regards,
Peter
From: Gyan Mishra mailto:hayabusa...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 11
Thank you Bin for your sharing your positive experience with PCEP-LS in the
field and continued experimenting in scenarios such as H-PCE and PCECC.
Thank you for supporting this experimental draft and interest in
progressing.
Kind Regards
Gyan
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 1:00 AM 윤빈영 wrote:
> Hi
From: julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: 30 March 2021 11:47
To: tom petch
Cc: pce@ietf.org; adr...@olddog.co.uk; draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and
Code Point Allocation)
Hi Tom,
What really matters for the IANA ea
Hi Dhruv,
New text is better, but the solution remains perfectible and not safer.
Again, it makes the assumption that PCE and PCC are perfectly synchronised
regarding
the TE-PATH-BINDING table which could not be the case. This mechanism is only
working
well if implementation has been correctly w
