Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

2021-09-21 Thread Gyan Mishra
I support WG adoption. Thanks Gyan On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 3:14 PM Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) < hooman.bidg...@nokia.com> wrote: > Support > > Thanks > Hooman > > -Original Message- > From: Pce On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 10:01

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

2021-09-21 Thread Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Support Thanks Hooman -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 10:01 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional Hi all, This e-mail starts an adoption poll for

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

2021-09-21 Thread Oscar González de Dios
Dear WG chairs, I think the document is ready to become a PCE WG Item and it addresses a relevant and useful topic. @authors, please find also some comments: After reading the full document it becomes clear how a PCEP peer can mark some objects as optional using the P

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

2021-09-21 Thread Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Yes / support WG adoption. On 2021-09-21, 10:01 AM, "Pce on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com" wrote: Hi all, This e-mail starts an adoption poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional-08 [1]. Do you consider this I-D is ready to become a PCE WG item? Please

[Pce] IPR Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

2021-09-21 Thread Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
Hi Authors, In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR rules. Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of: I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

2021-09-21 Thread olivier.dugeon
Yes/Support BR Olivier Le 21/09/2021 à 16:00, julien.meu...@orange.com a écrit : > Hi all, > > This e-mail starts an adoption poll for > draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional-08 [1]. Do you consider this I-D is > ready to become a PCE WG item? > > Please respond to the PCE list, including

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

2021-09-21 Thread Huaimo Chen
Hi Everyone, I think it is ready to become a PCE WG item. Best Regards, Huaimo From: Pce on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 10:00 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional Hi

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

2021-09-21 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Yes/support Cheers, Jeff > On Sep 21, 2021, at 07:01, julien.meu...@orange.com wrote: > > Hi all, > > This e-mail starts an adoption poll for > draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional-08 [1]. Do you consider this I-D is > ready to become a PCE WG item? > > Please respond to the PCE list,

[Pce] The PCE WG has placed draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2021-09-21 Thread IETF Secretariat
The PCE WG has placed draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Julien Meuric) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional/ ___ Pce mailing list

[Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

2021-09-21 Thread julien.meuric
Hi all, This e-mail starts an adoption poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional-08 [1]. Do you consider this I-D is ready to become a PCE WG item? Please respond to the PCE list, including rationale if you believe the WG should not adopt it. Thanks, Dhruv & Julien [1]