Hi Hari,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in
accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Thanks!
Dhruv
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 11:54 PM Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
wrote:
> Hi Authors,
>
> In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all
> authors and
Hi Hari,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Cheers,
Adrian
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
Sent: 16 December 2021 18:24
To: Farrel Adrian ; Dhruv Dhody ;
lizhen...@huawei.com
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: IPR Poll
Hi Authors,
In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all
authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance
with IETF IPR rules.
Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be
The PCE WG has placed draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Julien Meuric)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec/
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
Hi all,
This message is the following step to the situation previously
summarized by Dhruv [1].
As a result, do you believe that draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec [2] is a
right foundation to become (again) a PCE WG item?
Please respond to the PCE list, including any comment you may feel
