Hi Hari,
Trust this mail finds you well.
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules
Warm regards,
Luc-Fabrice
Ndifor
Specialist - IP Access and Data center
luc-fabrice.ndi...@mtn.com
T +237 677 55 02 13
Head Office: 360, Rue
Hi Dhruv
I reviewed the draft and support WG adoption.
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG?
Yes
Please state your reasons - Why / Why not?
This documents PCEP PMTU extension is valuable for any operator deployments
of SR-MPLS or SRv6 and/or uses SR-TE and want to ensure that
Hi, Dhruv:
I have read this document and support it adoption.
Some suggestions for the current contents are the followings:
1. The proposal in this draft is easy to understand, It is better to
simplify the “Introduction” part.
2. There should be one section about “Procedures for the
I support the adoption. Passing PMTU through PCEP is a very important extension
for SR TE LSP.
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 12:09 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-p...@ietf.org
Subject: WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
Hi WG,
Dear Hari,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Liuyan
2022-03-29
-
韩柳燕 / Han Liuyan
中国移动通信研究院 网络技术研究所 / China Mobile Research Institute
地址:
Reviewer: Mahesh Jethanandani
Review result: On the Right Track
I am not an expert in PCEP. This review is looking at the draft from a YANG
perspective. With that said, I am continuing to mark it as “On the Right Track”
because of some of the points discussed below.
Summary:
This document
Hi Authors,
In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all
authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance
with IETF IPR rules.
Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be
The PCE WG has placed draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Dhruv Dhody)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu/
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu/
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why
/ Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing
to work
