Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02

2022-12-01 Thread Gyan Mishra
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Thanks Gyan On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 4:24 PM Hariharan Ananthakrishnan wrote: > Hi Authors, > > In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all > authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance > with IETF IPR rules. >

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02

2022-12-01 Thread Balaji Rajagopalan
Hi, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed. -- Balaji Rajagopalan From: Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) Date: Friday, 2 December 2022 at 3:44 AM To: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan , peng.sha...@zte.com.cn , Balaji Rajagopalan , Vishnu Pavan Beeram ,

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02

2022-12-01 Thread Mike Koldychev (mkoldych)
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Thanks, Mike. From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2022 4:23 PM To: peng.sha...@zte.com.cn; bala...@juniper.net; vbee...@juniper.net; Mike Koldychev (mkoldych)

[Pce] IPR Poll on draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02

2022-12-01 Thread Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
Hi Authors, In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR rules. Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of: I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02

2022-12-01 Thread Cyril Margaria
I have read the document and I think it should be adopted as WGdocument. The functionality proposed is of interest and the mechanism align well with other use cases. Thanks, Cyril On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 05:07, Dhruv Dhody wrote: > Hi WG, > > This email begins the WG adoption poll for >