Re: [Pce] PCE SID-algo draft extension

2023-03-29 Thread Andrew Stone (Nokia)
Hi Samuel, PCE WG I think your comparison points cover the differences well. Comparing/contrasting the two scenarios and behaviors should probably be in the updated document, too. It does seem a need to signal the different behavior intention in some form or another (whether flag or

Re: [Pce] PCE SID-algo draft extension

2023-03-29 Thread peng.shaofu
Hi Samuel, WG, Thanks for the effort work to get the consensus about path computation according to the content of FAD. An explicit flag based on the existing SID-algo constraint for the purpose of behavior b, seems good to me. Regards, PSF Original From:

Re: [Pce] PCE SID-algo draft extension

2023-03-29 Thread Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
Hi all, Thanks all for discussion, which happened during PCE session and thanks for supporting this extension. I think that we agreed that it is necessary to consider FAD in the path-computation on PCE side if SID-algo constraint was specified, but we were not able to finish discussion