Hi Tom,
About the IPR at large, there's no way we can know for sure. What we can
do is reminding all IETF contributors about their duty with respect to
IETF policies. [1]
This is an adoption poll, it will end when the chairs will consider we
have enough feedback to gauge the WG's opinion.
Hari,
I too am unaware of any IPR associated with this I-D.
spt
> On Apr 6, 2023, at 08:14, Russ Housley wrote:
>
> Hart:
>
> I am unaware of any IPR associated with this draft.
>
> Russ
>
>
>> On Apr 5, 2023, at 11:30 PM, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hari,
>>
>> I am not aware of any
Hart:
I am unaware of any IPR associated with this draft.
Russ
> On Apr 5, 2023, at 11:30 PM, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>
> Hi Hari,
>
> I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
> in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
>
> Thanks!
> Dhruv
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 6,
Hi, All:
We have made some updates again to prepare for the WGLC.
Any comments are welcome.
We would also like to ask the Chairs to start the WGLC in recent days.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Path Computation
Element (PCE) WG of the IETF.
Title : PCEP Extension for Native IP Network
Authors : Aijun Wang
Boris Khasanov