[Pce] pce - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 117

Dear Dhruv Dhody, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request. pce Session 1 (1:30 requested) Monday, 24 July 2023, Session III 1530-1700 America/Los_Angeles Room Name: Plaza B size: 180

[Pce] Clarification regarding PCEP PCUpd MBB behavior

Hello Team, I found below highlighted text in RFC 8231: *6.2 . The PCUpd Message, page- 29* The PCC SHOULD minimize the traffic interruption and MAY use the make-before-break procedures described in [RFC3209

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor

Hi, I support the adoption. It is very useful to carry the vendor specific information for customized control. Best, Hang -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 3:47 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor

I support adoption. Thanks Gyan On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 3:46 AM wrote: > Hi all, > > It has been a while since draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor started to > document how to extend the scope of RFC 7470. It is now time to consider > its adoption by the WG. > Do you think

Re: [Pce] 答复: Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor

Hi Aijun, Thanks you for your supports. Great comments, we can add some words in the next revision in Introduction. Will let you know when we update the draft. Thank you again, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of Aijun Wang Sent: Friday, June 30, 2023 9:45 AM To: