Hi Gyan,
Thank you for your interest in our draft and for your questions. If some
operators have already implemented some validation check, it means that it is
really necessary to enhance validation, and it needs to be standardized to
achieve:
Devices from different vendors can achieve the
Hi Ketan,
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 8:38 PM Ketan Talaulikar
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> There are few aspects that need further work/discussion on this draft.
>
> 1) We need some text that specifies that for SRv6 (unlike in the case of
> SR-MPLS), the MSD capabilities of the headend node alone is
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Path Computation
Element (PCE) WG of the IETF.
Title : PCEP Extensions for Signaling Multipath Information
Authors : Mike Koldychev
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Path Computation
Element (PCE) WG of the IETF.
Title : PCEP extension to support Segment Routing Policy Candidate
Paths
Authors : Mike Koldychev
Hi Julien & Dhruv,
Many thanks for your work, we have uploaded the 00 revision draft.
Will address the comments in 01 very soon, and I think we may not receive too
many comments. The proposed update will be shared in Github, and send to the ML
before submitting.
The IETF datatracker status
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Path Computation
Element (PCE) WG of the IETF.
Title : Conveying Vendor-Specific Information in the Path
Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol
