Hi folks,
I support the WG LC of this document and think it ready for publication.
Best regards
Chongfeng
From: Dhruv Dhody
Date: 2024-02-21 17:32
To: pce@ietf.org
CC: pce-chairs; draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi WG,
Hi All,I read the latest version and support the publication of this
draft.
Best Regards,Shengnan Yue
-- Forwarded message -From: Pce On
Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 5:33 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs
Hi Cheng,
Thanks a lot for your responses. Ack for all of them, new proposed version
looks fine to me.
For “3.1 STATEFUL-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV section” I was really talking about
objects defined in RFC5440, but used in stateful messages. Isn’t that behavior
really “undefined” (before this
Hi WG,
I have read the draft and support its publication. It is a simple and useful
extension.
Thanks,
Hang
From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 5:33 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WGLC for
Hi WG,
I have read through this draft. The extensions are simple and efficient. I
support that it is ready to be published.
Cheers,
Mao
发件人: Dhruv Dhody
发送时间: 2024年2月21日 17:33
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
主题: WGLC for
