Thanks, Julien.
Once upon a time, I was quite skeptical about this idea, and unhappy to see it progress. But I have become used to the idea, and two things help me believe we should adopt this:
1. As an Experiment, this can be tried out and
The PCE WG has placed draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Julien Meuric)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
Hi all,
We have a long history around PCEP-LS. The rough consensus has been to
progress it as experimental within the PCE WG, which makes more sense
than an independent submission.
As a result, do you support draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-27 [1] to become
a PCE WG document? Please share your
Thanks Eric and Dhruv for your comments.
Please see my reply inline.
We also updated the drat accordingly to address your comments, please check,
HTML:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-25.html
HTMLized:
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-25.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the IETF.
Title: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions
for IPv6 Segment Routing
Authors: Cheng Li(Editor)
Hi Éric,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 12:53 AM Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-24: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email
