Hi all,For an experimental document, we have a decent level of support and no objection. Every author has responded to the IPR check. The I-D is thus adopted by the PCE WG.
@authors: Please, resubmit it as draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls-00.
Thanks, Julien On 04/04/2024 18:18, Julien Meuric wrote:
Hi all,We have a long history around PCEP-LS. The rough consensus has been to progress it as experimental within the PCE WG, which makes more sense than an independent submission. As a result, do you support draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-27 [1] to become a PCE WG document? Please share your feedback using the PCE mailing list, including your comments and especially your rationales in case you're opposed.Thank you, Julien --- [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
