thought it was clear in RFC 4655.
Young
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Edward
Crabbe
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 11:07 PM
To: Fatai Zhang
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] 答复: 答复: Questions about stateful PCE, relation to WG charter
and opinion
Hi Robert,
Yes, you are right.
Best Regards
Fatai
发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Robert Varga
发送时间: 2012年11月10日 0:43
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Pce] 答复: Questions about stateful PCE, relation to WG charter and
opinion about stateful PCE
On 11/09/2012 09:20 AM
Crabbe [mailto:e...@google.com]
发送时间: 2012年11月12日 11:59
收件人: Fatai Zhang
抄送: Jan Medved (jmedved); pce@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Pce] 答复: Questions about stateful PCE, relation to WG charter and
opinion about stateful PCE
We currently appear to be involved in some sort of pre-fiat working group
process
(jmedved); pce@ietf.org
*主题:* Re: [Pce] 答复: Questions about stateful PCE, relation to WG charter
and opinion about stateful PCE
** **
We currently appear to be involved in some sort of pre-fiat working group
process debate. Unfortunately, I think you're injecting a particularly
onerous
