Hi, Sheng:

Thanks for your review.
I have updated the draft to address your concerns/comments, and will upload
it together with other reviews.

Aijun Wang

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: forwardingalgori...@ietf.org [mailto:forwardingalgori...@ietf.org]
代表 Sheng Jiang via Datatracker
发送时间: 2024年1月30日 22:56
收件人: ops-...@ietf.org
抄送: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip....@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] Opsdir early review of
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-29

Reviewer: Sheng Jiang
Review result: Has Nits

I have reviewed this document as part of the OPS directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Comments
that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the
IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

Document: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-29
Reviewer: Sheng Jiang
Review Date: 2024-01-30
Result: Has Nits

This Standards Track document defines the Path Computation Element
Communication Protocol (PCEP) extension for Central Control Dynamic Routing
(CCDR) based applications in Native IP networks.

114: requireHs --> requires
127: nexthops --> next hops
464: lead --> leads
618: nexthop --> next hop
702: soley --> solely
845: multihop --> multi-hop 

There are many places that the "s" after the third person singular verbs are
missing.


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to