Hi, Chairs, WG, I have reviewed this draft and believe it is ready for publication. This work is useful for enabling PCE and PCC to negotiate the control of LSPs.
One minor comments on the text: In section 3, I was confused when first reading the last sentence on which flag is under discussion. Perhaps the following tweak helps remove the confusion. OLD: The flag has no meaning in the PCRpt and PCInitiate message and MUST be set to 0 on transmission and MUST be ignored on receipt. New: This new C flag has no meaning in the PCRpt and PCInitiate message and MUST be set to 0 on transmission and MUST be ignored on receipt. BTW, one of the reference of RFC8281 in section 4 is not correctly shown as hyperlink, please check the format. Thank you. Best wishes, Haomian -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Dhruv Dhody 发送时间: 2019年6月5日 0:26 收件人: pce@ietf.org 抄送: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-requ...@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-04 Hi WG, This email starts a working group last call for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-04. The WG LC will run for 2 weeks, till 19th June 2019. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request/ Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft, please articulate your concern. If you support, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication. Further, explaining the importance of the work in your opinion is appreciated. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome. Silence on the list, not so much :) Thanks, Dhruv, Julien, & Adrian _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
