Hi, All:
Yes/Support. One comments is that the author can also consider using the PCECC mechanism to edit dynamically the LSP path that formed by the traditional LSP path setup protocol. Such coordination can leverage the advantages of the central and distributed control protocol. Best Regards. Aijun Wang Network R&D and Operation Support Department China Telecom Corporation Limited Beijing Research Institute,Beijing, China. 发件人: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:Jonathan.Hardwick=40metaswitch....@dmarc.ietf.org] 发送时间: 2018年10月13日 22:47 收件人: pce@ietf.org 抄送: draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-control...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08 This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-contr oller/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends on Friday, October 26. Many thanks, Jon and Julien
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
