On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:38:13AM +0530, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Apologies for the delay. I am replying this email where we tackle
> points that needed some more discussion.
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 2:32 AM Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dhruv,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at
Hi Ben,
Apologies for the delay. I am replying this email where we tackle
points that needed some more discussion.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 2:32 AM Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
> Hi Dhruv,
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:45:23AM +0530, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > Thanks for your review, let
Hi Mahendra,
Thanks for the links. What's in the diff generally looks good; I think we
may still need to have a bit more discussion here about items (1) and (4)
(for the latter, I'm not sure if the plan is still to update the table to
list everything or just leave it to the body text).
Also,
Hi Ben/Dhruv,
Thanks for the review and clarification. Comments are incorporated in the
working copy (links below).
Working copy:
https://github.com/mahendnegi/ietf/blob/master/pce/path-protection/iesg/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-11.txt
Diff:
Hi Dhruv,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:45:23AM +0530, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thanks for your review, let me start the discussion and the authors
> can interject as needed.
Thanks; it's a great start.
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 5:14 AM Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
> wrote:
> >
> >
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your review, let me start the discussion and the authors
can interject as needed.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 5:14 AM Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
wrote:
>
> Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-10: Discuss
>
>
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-10: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
