Guichard's No Objection on
draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement-10: (with COMMENT)
Hi Jim,
Thank you for the review. I've made the following changes locally and will be
pushing with the next revision:
- Updated abstract to remark document updates RFC5440.
- Changed RFC7525 reference
Hi Jim,
Thank you for the review. I've made the following changes locally and will be
pushing with the next revision:
- Updated abstract to remark document updates RFC5440.
- Changed RFC7525 reference to RFC9325.
- Fixed the non-ascii text.
New nits result: Summary: 0 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~)
Thanks for the review, Jim. Regarding the warning about pre-RFC5378 work, I
think it might not apply in this case, since AFAICT there isn’t substantial
material from RFC 5440 incorporated into the present document. But of course,
the authors should consider this and make their own determination.
Jim Guichard has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
