; pce@ietf.org
Asunto: Re: [Pce] RV: New Version Notification for
draft-contreras-pce-pam-02.txt
Hi Luis,
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:59 PM LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
mailto:luismiguel.contrerasmuri...@telefonica.com>>
wrote:
Hi Dhruv,
Sorry for my late response.
In version -01 we pr
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Luis
>
>
>
> *De:* Dhruv Dhody
> *Enviado el:* miércoles, 14 de febrero de 2024 5:42
> *Para:* LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <
> luismiguel.contrerasmuri...@telefonica.com>
> *CC:* pce@ietf.org
> *Asunto:* Re: [Pce]
regards
Luis
De: Dhruv Dhody
Enviado el: miércoles, 14 de febrero de 2024 5:42
Para: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
CC: pce@ietf.org
Asunto: Re: [Pce] RV: New Version Notification for
draft-contreras-pce-pam-02.txt
H Luis, WG,
Did you consider defining a new METRIC Object-type (within
H Luis, WG,
Did you consider defining a new METRIC Object-type (within the existing
object-class 6) called Precision instead of defining a brand new object
with new object-class/object-type?
If we choose to define just a new object-type, it has an added advantage of
keeping the RBNF grammar
Dear all,
We have just updated draft-contreras-pce-pam in the following way:
- we have changed the approach moving from extending existing METRIC object to
proposing a new PRECISION METRIC object. The reason for that is we consider it
as a cleaner approach, also allowing clearer structure.
-
