u...@orange.com;
> draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-s...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of
> draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6
>
> Hi,
>
> Tl;dr I support the adoption of this draft.
>
> As a co-author of RFC 8283, I t
Hi all,
We have a decent level of support and no voice against. Consequently,
let's adopt this I-D as a new PCE work item.
Thanks,
Julien
On 16/01/2023 19:00, julien.meu...@orange.com wrote:
Hi all,
This e-mail starts an adoption poll for
-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6
Hi all,
This e-mail starts an adoption poll for
draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6-10 [1]. Do you
consider this I-D is ready to become a PCE WG item?
Please respond to the PCE list, including rationale if you believe the
WG should
Hi Everyone,
I read the draft and support its adoption.
Best Regards,
Huaimo
From: Pce on behalf of Gyan Mishra
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2023 9:21 PM
To: julien.meu...@orange.com
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of
draft-dhody-pce-pcep
I support WG adoption of PCEP PCECC centralized controller extension for
SRv6.
Thanks
Gyan
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 1:00 PM wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This e-mail starts an adoption poll for
> draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6-10 [1]. Do you
> consider this I-D is ready to become a
...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2023 2:00 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6
Hi all,
This e-mail starts an adoption poll for
draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6-10 [1
tf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of
draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6
Hi Julien and all,
Support this work as the very important part of overall PCECC architecture as
well as SRv6 development.
SY,
Boris
16.01.2023, 21:00, "julien.
Hi All,
I’ve read this document and think it is useful , thus I support its adoption.
Best regards,
Pang Ran.
From: julien.meu...@orange.com<mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com>
Date: 2023-01-17 02:00
To: pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pc
Hi Julien and WG,
Yes, it is actually for the adoption of
draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6. Sorry for intrude into
the other thread. :)
16.01.2023, 21:00, "julien.meu...@orange.com" :
Hi all,
This e-mail starts an adoption poll for
Hi Julien and all, Support this work as the very important part of overall PCECC architecture as well as SRv6 development. SY,Boris 16.01.2023, 21:00, "julien.meu...@orange.com" :Hi all,This e-mail starts an adoption poll fordraft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6-10 [1]. Do
18:00
> To: pce@ietf.org <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of
> draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6
>
> Hi all,
>
> This e-mail starts an adoption poll for
> draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6-10 [1]. Do you
> consid
replace "TBD" with "44".
---
Through-out...
It *might* be worth renumbering the TBDs to take care of the fact that
there is no TBD2.
-Original Message-
From: Pce On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: 16 January 2023 18:00
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption
Institute,Guangzhou,China
Work Email: tan...@chinatelecom.cn
Mobile: (86)15603005002
From: julien.meu...@orange.com
Date: 2023-01-17 02:00
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6
Hi all,
This e-mail starts an adoption poll for
draft-dhody
AM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of
> draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6
>
> Hi all,
>
> This e-mail starts an adoption poll for
> draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6-10 [1]. Do you consider
> this
> I-D is ready to become a P
Dear Chairs
How are you doing?
This is Felix from China Telecom.
From my own perspective, I think this document has specified useful procedures
and PCEP extensions when a PCE-based controller is also responsible for
computing the explicit forwarding paths in the SRv6 network.
So I support the
Hi all,
I have read the document and find PCECC for SRv6 is useful. I support the WG
adoption of the document.
Tan
-邮件原件-
发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 julien.meu...@orange.com
发送时间: 2023年1月17日 2:00
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension
: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2023 2:00 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6
Hi all,
This e-mail starts an adoption poll for
draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce
Hi all,
This e-mail starts an adoption poll for
draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6-10 [1]. Do you
consider this I-D is ready to become a PCE WG item?
Please respond to the PCE list, including rationale if you believe the
WG should not adopt it.
Thanks,
Julien
[1]
18 matches
Mail list logo
