Re: [Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-12.txt

2018-07-10 Thread Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Hardwick ; Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) ; pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-12.txt Jon, Looks great to me, thanks for the change! Cheers, Jeff On 7/10/18, 04:19, "Pce on behalf of Jonathan Hardwick" wrote: Hi Mustapha

Re: [Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-12.txt

2018-07-10 Thread Jeff Tantsura
uot;). Thanks Jon -Original Message- From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) [mailto:mustapha.aissa...@nokia.com] Sent: 29 June 2018 19:19 To: Jonathan Hardwick ; pce@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-12.txt Hi Jon

Re: [Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-12.txt

2018-07-10 Thread Jonathan Hardwick
uot;MSD exceeds the default for the PCEP session"). Thanks Jon -Original Message- From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) [mailto:mustapha.aissa...@nokia.com] Sent: 29 June 2018 19:19 To: Jonathan Hardwick ; pce@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-segment-ro

Re: [Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-12.txt

2018-06-29 Thread Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Hi Jon, There is one issue which I would like to discuss and it came up during the EANTC multi-vendor interop in March 2018. The rule for handling MSD in Section 5.5 seems to be overly restrictive. The MSD value advertised in the Open message is useful as an upper bound for both pce-initiated