[Pce] Comments on draft-crabbe-pce-stateful-pce-protection-00

Hi, Please find some review comments for this draft... *(1) Introduction* a. There are various cases here, say Passive stateful PCE where the primary and backup path request will be encoded in a separate path request. The handling of LSP-ID here can be described. b. For active stateful PCE

Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-00

Hi Margaria: Sorry for delayed response. Please see in-line. Thanks Regards Š Zafar -Original Message- From: Margaria, cyril.marga...@nsn.com cyril.marga...@nsn.com Date: Thursday, February 21, 2013 7:44 AM To: draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-...@tools.ietf.org

[Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Dear all, There was a good consensus in adopting draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-awarehttp://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware-05.txt as a PCE WG document but as usual, we would like to confirm on the mailing list. Please express your opinion Yes/No (comments welcome too).

[Pce] Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ?

Dear all, There was a good consensus in adopting draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a PCE WG document but as usual, we would like to confirm on the mailing list. Please express your opinion Yes/No (comments welcome too). Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes, support. Young From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 3:14 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ? Dear all, There was a good consensus in

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ?

Yes, support. Young (co-author) From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 3:18 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ? Dear all, There was a good

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes! Support! Dhruv (as a co-author) On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:43 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.comwrote: Dear all, There was a good consensus in adopting draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-awarehttp://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware-05.txt as a PCE WG

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes, support! All the best, Kenichi On 3/12/13 5:13 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) wrote: Dear all, There was a good consensus in adopting draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware-05.txt as a PCE WG document but as usual, we would like to

[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ?

Yes, support! Dan 发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 JP Vasseur (jvasseur) 发送时间: 2013年3月12日 4:18 收件人: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ? Dear all, There was a good consensus in adopting draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as

[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes/Support. Thanks Fatai 发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 JP Vasseur (jvasseur) [jvass...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2013年3月12日 4:13 到: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ? Dear

[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ?

Yes/Support as a co-author. Thanks Fatai 发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 JP Vasseur (jvasseur) [jvass...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2013年3月12日 4:17 到: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ?

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Support. Lyndon ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes! Support! Udayasree On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:43 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com wrote: Dear all, There was a good consensus in adopting draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware-05.txt as a PCE WG document