[Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [Pce] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Dhruv, On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Dhruv Dhody wrote: > Will add. Thanks for the text. Now that you have feedback from at least one SEC AD, I wanted to add that I thought your text was very helpful (and even more helpful with Kathleen's addition, of course).

Re: [Pce] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Will add. Thanks for the text. Dhruv On Thursday 15 September 2016, Kathleen Moriarty < kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for the quick response. inline. > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Dhruv Dhody > wrote: > > Hi

Re: [Pce] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Hello, Thanks for the quick response. inline. On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Dhruv Dhody wrote: > Hi Kathleen, > > Thanks for your review. > I am posting the updated security consideration text (same as in the reply to > Stephen), see inline. > >> -Original

Re: [Pce] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Kathleen, Thanks for your review. I am posting the updated security consideration text (same as in the reply to Stephen), see inline. > -Original Message- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kathleen Moriarty > Sent: 14 September 2016 22:27 > To: The IESG

Re: [Pce] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Stephen, Thanks for your review. Please see inline... > -Original Message- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell > Sent: 14 September 2016 17:16 > To: The IESG > Cc: pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aw...@ietf.org; >

Re: [Pce] Some thoughts on H-PCE topology construction in Connections and Accesses for H-PCE

Hi Eric, Thanks much for your comments. The static configurations will be minimum regarding to distributing connections and accesses from a child PCE to its parent PCE. A child PCE (not as a parent of others) will distribute the connections to its domain to its parent automatically and

[Pce] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)

[Pce] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please