Hi Mahendra,
Thanks for the links. What's in the diff generally looks good; I think we
may still need to have a bit more discussion here about items (1) and (4)
(for the latter, I'm not sure if the plan is still to update the table to
list everything or just leave it to the body text).
Also,
Hariharan Ananthakrishnan has requested publication of
draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-02 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the PCE
working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags/
New revision to ask IANA to add this document as a reference in the
appropriate registry (as suggested by Hari).
-Original Message-
From: Pce On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: 23 September 2019 11:42
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] I-D Action:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.
Title : Updated Rules for Processing Stateful PCE Request
Parameters Flags
Author : Adrian Farrel
Hi,
IMHO, including the new reference in the registry could be valuable and
makes no harm. And now that the text is written, why leaving it out?
Thanks Hari and Adrian,
Julien
On 22/09/2019 22:16, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m willing to be guided here.
>
> I don’t think the new draft
