[Pce] New Co-Chair for PCE

Hi, Please welcome Jon Hardwick as a 3rd co-chair for PCE! Thanks, Deborah ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] AD review: draft-ietf-pce-iro-update

Hi, I've done my AD review of this document and only had a few comments: - I've provided the author with some editorial suggestions to improve the abstract and introduction. - As the survey document will not be progressed to RFC, it will be best to remove the reference to it from

Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

. Now I need to get to my “current” lunch before it’s not current☺ (Thanks for all the interest!) Deborah From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF [mailto:spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 11:43 AM To: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A <db3...@att.com> Cc: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dh...@h

Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mirja, Yes, thanks Mirja for you detailed review. As Dhruv noted, this is not representing an average utilization, but the current bandwidth utilization. As Dhruv noted, we could swap this sentence in the Abstract for the term later used in section 4.2.2 "actual". For me, though, current

Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-07: (with COMMENT)

Thanks Alvaro and Mirja for your comments to improve! And Xian and authors for fast editing! Deborah From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana (aretana) Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 8:33 AM To: Zhangxian (Xian) ; The IESG Cc:

Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi all, After digging out from snow yesterday and some off-line discussion digging, here's an update for the IESG. For this draft, we will retain the text as is, with the RECOMMENDED and the informative reference to draft-ietf-pcep-pceps. Background info: - this draft does not update any

Re: [Pce] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5440 (4956)

Hi Adrian, Much thanks for the catch. I've verified - hopefully this meets your criteria for SOON as I would not want to be an example in your draft:-) Deborah > -Original Message- > From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 5:46 AM > To:

Re: [Pce] Best Wishes for the future of PCE WG !

: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:30 AM To: pce@ietf.org; Julien Meuric <julien.meu...@orange.com>; jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com; BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A <db3...@att.com>; Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk>; d.k...@lancaster.ac.uk; Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dh...@huawei.com> Subject: Be

Re: [Pce] PCE working group secretary

Dan - thanks for all your work! Dhruv - welcome! All the best- Deborah From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 7:22 AM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: Daniel King ; pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] PCE working group

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04.txt

Much thanks Dhruv for holding the pen on this one! Not hearing any comments/concerns on the updates, I'll approve- Deborah > -Original Message- > From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dhruv.dh...@huawei.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 6:19 AM > To: pce@ietf.org > Cc: BR

Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)

Hi Alvaro, It seems the PCE Chairs and Document Shepherd (one of the PCE Chairs) are on vacation as not responding. The disclosure was after the WG Last Call as during Document Shepherd review, the Shepherd realized the IPR on RFC6006 was not posted against the bis. He requested it to be

Re: [Pce] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8233 (5389)

Thanks Jon -Original Message- From: Jonathan Hardwick Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 7:06 AM To: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody Subject: FW: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8233 (5389) Just to confirm, this errata is correct. Jon

[Pce] Quiet period for document publication?

Hi, I've had several inquiries on progressing documents, here's an update. As a result of an extremely heavy load for the telechats during these couple of months due to exiting ADs clearing their decks and the resulting overwhelming load for the directorate reviewers, the remaining ADs have

[Pce] AD review: draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext

Dear Authors, I've done my AD review of your document, I've noted a couple of items which need to be clarified before starting IETF Last Call. As draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions just finished Last Call and is being revised for comments, please follow closely its progress so as to stay

Re: [Pce] [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Early Review: draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions

Hardwick' ; rtg-...@ietf.org; 'Yemin (Amy)' ; pce@ietf.org; BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Early Review: draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions I agree with you both. My comment was imprecise with the level of formality intended. The intent was to make SG15 aware

[Pce] Replacing Jon as PCE Co-Chair

Hi PCEers, As announced at IETF103, Jon Hardwick has requested to step down as PCE Co-Chair. We thank him for his many years of service and wish him all the best! As Jon is very difficult to replace and to help Julien over these next several months, I’ve decided to replace Jon with two

Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Thanks Dhruv for the clarification. As the working group supports this approach, I support also. In the future, we can consider Mirja's suggestion if we see this becoming more popular. Thanks everyone- Deborah -Original Message- From: iesg On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent:

[Pce] Adrian stepping down as PCE co-chair

Hi, As we noted earlier, Adrian stepped in to help us with the PCE document queue and help bring Dhruv on as a new chair. He has done a fantastic job and Dhruv and Julien are now ready to go forward. We very much appreciate his support and thank him for all his help! Deborah

Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-09: (with COMMENT)

ec. Thanks! Deborah -Original Message- From: Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2019 4:45 AM To: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A ; Dhruv Dhody Cc: pce-chairs ; pce@ietf.org; The IESG ; draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-requ...@ietf.org; Hariharan Ananthakrishnan Subject: Re

Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi, RFC8231 implementations do not need to be aware of this RFC's capability. Only for those wanting to support this new capability, they will follow this RFC. As the capability is optional - not required for RFC8231 implementations - to me that's an "extension", not an "update". Thanks!

Re: [Pce] Rtgdir last call review of draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-02

Hi Mike, Much thanks for your review! Adrian, I'm also a bit confused on the intention of the draft. While the tools are not error checking a draft with intended status of PS against a title indicating an individual submission, the title does indicate the source of the document. With the

Re: [Pce] Rtgdir last call review of draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-02

al Message- From: Adrian Farrel Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 4:47 PM To: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A ; rtg-...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org; draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags@ietf.org Subject: RE: Rtgdir last call review of draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-02 Hello Deborah, I wonder whether s

Re: [Pce] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-14

Hi Elwyn, Benjamin, Much thanks for the careful review! Ben is correct that an Informational document can be normatively referenced. There are differences in how the different working groups do references. In PCE, requirements documents are not usually normatively referenced (e.g. 5540, 8231,

[Pce] ANRW TE talk at IETF108

Hi TE fans, Take note, there will be an ANRW "Transport Protocols and Traffic Engineering" talk on July 30 (Thursday) at 14:10 UTC: https://irtf.org/anrw/2020/program.html Good weekends- Deborah ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org

[Pce] AD comments: draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-13.txt

Much thanks Nic for your review! And thanks Cheng for holding the pen as we take this document forward! I agree with Nic, it is very difficult to rationalize this number of authors for this document. Recommend either limit to five or choose an editor(s) and keep only the editors on the front

Re: [Pce] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-15: (with COMMENT)

Hi Murray, Thanks for your comment! As an operator, this is my fav question to reply Use of BCP 14 language for a manageability section has long been a practice in our pce documents and other documents (of my groups). We learned from our previous (famous on manageability) AD how important

Re: [Pce] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-09

Hi Victoria, Much thanks for your careful review! Authors, please address Victoria's comments. Thanks, Deborah From: Pce On Behalf Of Pritchard, Victoria Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2020 8:16 AM To: rtg-...@ietf.org Cc: rtg-...@ietf.org;

Re: [Pce] [CCAMP] Proposed Liaison to ITU SG15 Q6, Q12, and Q14 on WSON Impairments

Hi Julien, Great - thanks for the clarification. I'll update. Deborah -Original Message- From: julien.meu...@orange-ftgroup.com [mailto:julien.meu...@orange-ftgroup.com] Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 5:41 AM To: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A, ATTLABS; cc...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject

Re: [Pce] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-impairments-07.txt

This working group last call has ended. The chairs will prepare for forwarding for publication. -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTSI) Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 3:29 PM To: CCAMP Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce