Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

[Tarek Saad (tsaad)]

Yes, support.

Regards,
Tarek

From: JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.commailto:jvass...@cisco.com
Date: Monday, 11 March, 2013 4:13 PM
To: pce@ietf.orgmailto:pce@ietf.org pce@ietf.orgmailto:pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG 
document ?

Dear all,

There was a good consensus in adopting 
draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-awarehttp://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware-05.txt
 as a PCE WG document but as usual, we would like to confirm on the mailing 
list.
Please express your opinion Yes/No (comments welcome too).

Thanks.

JP and Julien.
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

[Tarek Saad (tsaad)]

Support.

Regards,
Tarek

On 2014-03-04 5:51 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com wrote:

Dear WG,

As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had some support
for adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt
as a PCE WG.

Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of
adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as a WG document
?

Thanks.

JP and Julien.
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document

[Tarek Saad (tsaad)]

Support.

Regards,
Tarek

On 2014-09-14, 6:06 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com wrote:

Dear WG,

We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting
draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt and this work
has considerably progressed in other WG.

Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt
as a PCE WG document ?

Thanks.

JP and Julien.




___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] FW: New Version Notification for draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-04.txt

[Tarek Saad (tsaad)]

Hi authors,

Currently, the document proposes a numbered-based ID for the profiles. The
name-based IDs are in practice more favourable in deployment (an example
is the symbolic name for PCE instantiated LSP).
Do you plan to extend the PATH-PROFILE object to carry textual based IDs?
Also, it would be useful to clarify the scope of the PP IDs-- e.g. between
PCEP peer pairs, or global across the network/PCEs..
For example, upon (re)delegation of LSPs from a PCE to alternate PCE, is
the expectation that such PP-IDs can change?

Regards,
Tarek

On 2014-11-10, 8:19 AM, Santiago Alvarez (saalvare) saalv...@cisco.com
wrote:

Folks,

We've submitted a new version of draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles.  Based
on previous feedback, we've added details on motivation and some
introductory text.  We've also added text on security considerations.
Here's a view of the diffs:
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-04.txt
 
Your comments are welcome. Thanks.
Cheers.

SA
--


 -Original Message-
 From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
 Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2014 9:21 PM
 To: Luis Tomotaki; Siva Sivabalan (msiva); Jeff Tantsura; Siva
 Sivabalan (msiva); Rob Shakir; Santiago Alvarez (saalvare); Rob Shakir;
 Zafar Ali (zali); Victor Lopez; Zafar Ali (zali); Luis Tomotaki; Victor
 Lopez; Santiago Alvarez (saalvare); Jeff Tantsura
 Subject: New Version Notification for draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-
 04.txt
 
 
 A new version of I-D, draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-04.txt
 has been successfully submitted by Santiago Alvarez and posted to the
 IETF repository.
 
 Name:draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles
 Revision:04
 Title:   PCE Path Profiles
 Document date:   2014-11-07
 Group:   Individual Submission
 Pages:   13
 URL:http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-alvarez-pce-
 path-profiles-04.txt
 Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-alvarez-pce-
 path-profiles/
 Htmlized:   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvarez-pce-path-
 profiles-04
 Diff:   http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-alvarez-pce-
 path-profiles-04
 
 Abstract:
This document describes extensions to the Path Computation Element
(PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP) to signal path profile
identifiers.  A profile represents a list of path parameters or
policies that a PCEP peer may invoke on a remote peer using an
 opaque
identifier.  When a path computation client (PCC) initiates a path
computation request, the PCC can signal profile identifiers to
 invoke
path parameters or policies defined on the PCE which would influence
the path computation.  Similarly, when a PCE initiates or updates a
path, the PCE can signal profile identifiers to invoke path
parameters or policies defined on the PCC which would influence the
path setup.
 
 
 
 
 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
 submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
 tools.ietf.org.
 
 The IETF Secretariat

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Agenda requests for joint MPLS/PCE/TEAS Yang session

[Tarek Saad (tsaad)]

Hi Matt,

We¹d like to ask for a 10-15mins slot to present the updates for TE and
RSVP YANG models in the joint yang session.

for drafts: 
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te
draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp

Regards,
Tarek



On 2016-03-17, 12:20 PM, "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" 
wrote:

>All,
>
>Final reminder. Deadline for requests is tomorrow.
>
>Cheers
>
>Matt
>
>> All,
>> 
>> A reminder: deadline for slot requests is Friday.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Matt
>> 
>> > All,
>> >
>> > On the agenda for Buenos Aires, we have a session on Tuesday April
>> > 5th,
>> > 17:30 - 19:00 in Atlantico B. This is currently listed as a TEAS
>> > meeting, but is intended as a joint MPLS/PCE/TEAS meeting for the
>> > discussion of Yang models.
>> >
>> > If you'd like a slot to present a Yang draft in Buenos Aires, please
>> > send a request to me and the WG chairs by Friday March 18th. Please
>> > note the dates below; in particular, the deadline for draft submission
>> > is UTC 23:59 on March 21st.
>> >
>> > We'll need slides for presentation by Friday, April 1st. Again, please
>> > send to me and the Chairs.
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > Matt

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09

[Tarek Saad (tsaad)]

Yes/support.

Regards,
Tarek

From: Pce  on behalf of Jonathan Hardwick 

Date: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 at 12:59 PM
To: "pce@ietf.org" 
Cc: "draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p...@ietf.org" 
, "pce-cha...@ietf.org" 

Subject: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09


All,



This is start of a two week poll on making draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09 
a PCE working group document.  This draft fills a gap in explaining how 
stateful PCE can be applied to P2MP paths.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp/



Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” 
or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.



The poll ends on Tuesday July 12.



Thanks,

Jon, JP and Julien


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04

[Tarek Saad (tsaad)]

Hi PCE WG and chairs,

Yes/support this work to be adopted.

Regards,
Tarek

From: Pce  on behalf of Jonathan Hardwick 

Date: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 10:05 AM
To: "pce@ietf.org" , "draft-barth-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org" 

Cc: "pce-cha...@ietf.org" 
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04

Dear PCE WG

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-association-bidir/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” 
or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Tuesday, April 24.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce