Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association

[Satish K]

Yes/Support.

Regards,
Satish.

On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 6:30 PM Adrian Farrel  wrote:

> Hi WG,
>
> He authors of draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association have been asking for
> adoption and...
>
> - the base PCEP association extensions seem to be stable and advancing
> - I did an early review and the authors span a new version
>
> So, this starts an adoption poll for the draft. Because IETF-105 is
> imminent
> and you all have lots to do and read, we'll make this a three week poll
> ending on 4th August.
>
> Please send your comments of support or antipathy.
>
> In either case, please indicate whether or not you have read the draft, and
> if you support it, please say whether or not you propose to and even
> possibly implement the draft.
>
> Many thanks,
> Adrian (for the chairs)
>
> ___
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-04

[Satish K]

Yes / Support.

Regards,
Satish.

On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:56 PM Dhruv Dhody  wrote:

> Hi WG,
>
> This email starts a working group last call for
> draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-04. The WG LC will run for 2 weeks, till
> 19th June 2019.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request/
>
> Please indicate your support or concern for this draft.
>
> If you are opposed to the progression of the draft, please articulate your
> concern.
>
> If you support, please indicate that you have read the latest version and
> it is ready for publication. Further, explaining the importance of the
> work in
> your opinion is appreciated.
>
> As always, review comments and nits are most welcome. Silence on the list,
> not
> so much :)
>
> Thanks,
> Dhruv, Julien, & Adrian
>
> ___
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Working Group last call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06

[Satish K]

Hi WG,

We have implemented H-PCE in our ACTN Solution and implemented few features
of it in IETF-97 Hackathon.
Also the E2E solution of ACTN using H-PCE is showcased during Bits-n-Bytes
as well.

So i am very much interested and looking forward to see this draft is
getting published.

Thanks & Regards,
Satish Karunanithi

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:31 AM Adrian Farrel  wrote:

> Hi working group,
>
> This email starts a working group last call for
> draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06.
>
> I would like to hear messages of support or concern about this draft.
>
> If you support its progression towards publication as an RFC, please let us
> know that you have read the latest revision, and explain why you think the
> work is important. Indications of implementation would also be welcome -
> although this document is informational, I believe some people may have
> built stateful hierarchical PCEs for experimentation or deployment.
>
> If you are opposed to the progression or have concerns please articulate
> them.
>
> As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.
>
> Because of the effort that is going in to preparing for IETF-104 and
> because
> of the time spent away, this last call will run for three weeks and end on
> April 4th.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> ___
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

[Satish K]

Yes/Support

On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 8:27 PM Jonathan Hardwick  wrote:

> This is the start of a two week poll on making
> draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08 a PCE working group
> document.
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller/
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating
> “yes/support” or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your
> reasons.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to
> see addressed once the document is a WG document.
>
>
>
> The poll ends on Friday, October 26.
>
>
>
> Many thanks,
>
>
>
> Jon and Julien
>
>
> ___
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Working group last call (including final IPR check) for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints

[Satish K]

Hi Chairs,

I have reviewed the document and also as a developer of PCE in ONOS
controller some of these code points we had used for our tests.

I feel it's ready for publication.

Regards,
Satish.

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Jonathan Hardwick <
jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> wrote:

> Dear PCE working group
>
>
>
> This email starts a working group last call for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-
> codepoints-02.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints/
>
>
>
> Please read the document and reply to the PCE mailing list whether you
> believe this document is ready to be published, or not (including any
> comments on why not).  The last call will end on *Friday 10 November*.
>
>
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
> draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-02, to ensure that IPR has been
> disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and
> 5378 for more details) prior to moving forward.  If you are a document
> author, please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The document won't progress without
> answers from all the authors.  No IPR disclosures currently exist against
> this document.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Jon and Julien
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
>
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn-02

[Satish K]

Yes/Support

Thanks,
Satish


On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Jonathan Hardwick <
jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> wrote:

> All,
>
>
>
> This is the start of a two week poll on making
> draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn-02 a PCE working group document.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn/
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating
> “yes/support” or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your
> reasons.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to
> see addressed once the document is a WG document.
>
>
>
> The poll ends on Tuesday, May 9.
>
>
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Jon
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
>
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] FlexE side meeting

[Satish K]

Hi Daniele,

I am unable to play the recording of this meeting using the below link.  Is
this the correct link?

The recordings can be found at the following link
http://recs.conf.meetecho.com/Playout/watch.jsp?recording=
IETF98_CCAMP_FlexE=chapter_1

Regards,
Satish.


On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Daniele Ceccarelli <
daniele.ceccare...@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> thanks for the useful and productive meeting.
>
>
>
> I’ve uploaded the slides in the CCAMP page as well as the minutes (thanks
> to Andy for putting them together)
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/session/ccamp
>
>
>
> The recordings can be found at the following link
>
> http://recs.conf.meetecho.com/Playout/watch.jsp?recording=
> IETF98_CCAMP_FlexE=chapter_1
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Daniele & Nic
>
>
>
> *From:* Daniele Ceccarelli
> *Sent:* martedì 28 marzo 2017 12:10
> *To:* Daniele Ceccarelli ; pce@ietf.org;
> TEAS WG ; routing-discuss...@ietf.org; m...@ietf.org;
> cc...@ietf.org
> *Cc:* Ignas Bagdonas ; draft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk@
> ietf.org; n.leym...@telekom.de
> *Subject:* RE: [CCAMP] FlexE side meeting
>
>
>
> …and the agenda
>
>
>
> >> The agenda will be:
>
> >>
>
> >> 1. FlexE background and origins: Haomian Zheng
>
> >> 2. FlexE Technology Deep Dive:   Iftekhar Hussain
>
> >> 3. FlexE in the IETF:Mach Chen
>
> >> 4. Open Mic
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-boun...@ietf.org ] *On
> Behalf Of *Daniele Ceccarelli
> *Sent:* martedì 28 marzo 2017 12:00
> *To:* pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG ; routing-discuss...@ietf.org;
> m...@ietf.org; cc...@ietf.org
> *Cc:* Ignas Bagdonas ; draft-izh-ccamp-flexe-fwk@
> ietf.org; n.leym...@telekom.de
> *Subject:* [CCAMP] FlexE side meeting
>
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> a reminder for the FlexE side meeting and the link to Meetecho:
>
>
>
> When: Tuesday 18:45-20:15
>
> Room: Zurich B
>
> Remote participation - Meetecho: http://www.meetecho.com/
> ietf98/CCAMP-FlexE
>
>
>
> BR
> Daniele, Nic, Loa
>
> ___
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
>
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce