Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

2024-05-05 Thread Gyan Mishra
Dear WG, I support WG adoption of this work. This work has had a long history and has matured and I believe is ready to be progressed. I believe that PCEP-LS would be valuable for operators and is not much change if using PCE CC centralized SDN controller. Thanks Gyan On Thu, Apr 4, 2024

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

2024-04-26 Thread julien . meuric
Hi all, For an experimental document, we have a decent level of support and no objection. Every author has responded to the IPR check. The I-D is thus adopted by the PCE WG. @authors: Please, resubmit it as draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls-00. Thanks, Julien On 04/04/2024 18:18, Julien Meuric

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

2024-04-23 Thread daniel
, hence I support (as author) the adoption of the draft. Cheers, Daniele From: Pce mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org> > On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 7:17 PM To: julien.meu...@orange.com <mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com> ; pce@ietf.org <mailto:pce@ie

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

2024-04-18 Thread Lizhenbin
Zhenbin Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068 Email: lizhen...@huawei.com 发件人:julien.meuric mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com>> 收件人:pce mailto:pce@ietf.org>> 时 间:2024-04-04 18:20:29 主 题:[Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls Hi all, We have a long history around PCEP-L

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

2024-04-16 Thread Cheng Li
To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls Hi Julien, I support the WG adoption of this work. It has been a long time since this work was started. It is an useful experiment. It would be good if the WG adopts it and progresses

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

2024-04-15 Thread Aijun Wang
: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.orgSubject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls Thanks, Julien.   Once upon a time, I was quite skeptical about this idea, and unhappy to see it progress. But I have become used to the idea, and two things help me believe we should adopt this:   1

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

2024-04-12 Thread daniele.ietf
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 7:17 PM To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls Thanks, Julien. Once upon a time, I was quite skeptical about this idea, and unhappy to see it progress. But I have become used to the idea

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

2024-04-12 Thread Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
-Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 12:19 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls Hi all, We have a long history around PCEP-LS. The rough consensus has been to progress

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

2024-04-04 Thread Adrian Farrel
Thanks, Julien.   Once upon a time, I was quite skeptical about this idea, and unhappy to see it progress. But I have become used to the idea, and two things help me believe we should adopt this:   1. As an Experiment, this can be tried out and

[Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

2024-04-04 Thread julien . meuric
Hi all, We have a long history around PCEP-LS. The rough consensus has been to progress it as experimental within the PCE WG, which makes more sense than an independent submission. As a result, do you support draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-27 [1] to become a PCE WG document? Please share your