] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 4:40 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
Hi all,
It looks like there is support on this I-D and all authors have responded to
the IPR check. We can adopt it as a WG document
e:
> Hi PCE WG,
>
> In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there
> for a little while, after it was discussed face to face. We would now
> like you to voice your opinion on the list: do you think this I-D can be
> the foundation for a PCE WG's work ite
I support the adoption.
Will work with the authors on some pieces that need to be clarified.
Cheers,
Jeff
On Sep 25, 2019, 9:21 AM -0700, julien.meu...@orange.com, wrote:
> Hi PCE WG,
>
> In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there
> for a little
WG and chairs,
I have reviewed this document and think it should be adopted as a
pce wg doc.
/Loa
On 2019-09-25 18:20, julien.meu...@orange.com wrote:
Hi PCE WG,
In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there
for a little while, after it was discussed face to face
Hi Dhruv, Julien, et al.,
yes/support
I've read the draft and believe it is ready to be adopted by the PCE WG.
The draft proposes a much-needed solution to OAM in SR-MPLS.
Regards,
Greg
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:21 AM wrote:
> Hi PCE WG,
>
> In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pc
Hi,
Support (as co-author) the adoption!
Best regards,
Mach
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 12:21 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
Hi PCE WG
-sr-path-segment?
Hi PCE WG,
In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there for a
little while, after it was discussed face to face. We would now like you to
voice your opinion on the list: do you think this I-D can be the foundation for
a PCE WG's work item?
Please send
September 26, 2019 12:21 AM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
>
> Hi PCE WG,
>
> In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there for a
> little while, after it was discussed face to face. We would now li
Hi WG,
I support the adoption of this draft.
The PCEP extension for path segment will benefit the automation
deployment.
Best Regards,
Huanan
From: julien.meu...@orange.com
Date: 2019-09-26 00:20
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
Hi PCE
Hi WG,
Support as a co-author. I think the draft is mature and steady and being
implemented by ZTE Product.
I support the adoption of this draft.
Best Regards,
Quan
<<[Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
Wed, 25 September 2019 16:20 UTCShow header
Hi PCE WG,
egment-03> be
informative reference?
Thanks,
Rakesh
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 12:21 PM wrote:
> Hi PCE WG,
>
> In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there
> for a little while, after it was discussed face to face. We would now
> like you to voice your opinio
Hi WG,
I support the adoption of this draft.
Best Regards,
Shunwan
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 12:21 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
Hi
-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 12:21 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
Hi PCE WG,
In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there for a
little
] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 12:21 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
Hi PCE WG,
In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there for a
little while, after it was discussed face to face. We
Hi PCE WG,
In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there
for a little while, after it was discussed face to face. We would now
like you to voice your opinion on the list: do you think this I-D can be
the foundation for a PCE WG's work item?
Please send your feedback
15 matches
Mail list logo
