Hi Young.
Thank you for the update. I think I can live with the Re-optimize
phrase as it is.
Just a few remaining nits:
- still some double spacing
- s/PCE-based Architecture/PCE-based architecture/
- s/network.The PCE/network. The PCE/
- s/constraining the path to have/constraining the paths
Hi Julien,
Thanks for your quick review on the update. I made all the changes you
indicated below as well as the double spacing for a few places.
I will publish in a minute v.13.
Thanks,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com]
Sent: Friday,
Hi Young and WSON co-authors.
As part of the shepherding of the WSON requirement draft, please find
below some comments to address before sending to the IESG.
Regards,
Julien
--
Globally, the way the top-level section titles are indented creates
troubles to IETF tools, including
Hi Julien,
Let me know if there are any more remaining issues before closing WG LC for
this draft.
Thanks,
Young
From: Cyril Margaria [mailto:cyril.marga...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 11:58 AM
To: Leeyoung
Cc: Julien Meuric; pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: FW: [Pce] I-D Action:
Hi Julien,
This update reflects all the comments received from Cyril and Ramon as part of
the WG LC.
Cyril, please let the WG know if this update satisfies your comment.
Best Regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Hi Young,
This update reflects all my comments, I am OK with this version.
Best Regards,
Cyril.
On 28 April 2014 12:31, Leeyoung leeyo...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi Julien,
This update reflects all the comments received from Cyril and Ramon as
part of the WG LC.
Cyril, please let the WG know
