Re: [Pce] PCE and TED - was: Adoption of draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-06

2011-09-26 Thread Olivier Dugeon
Hello Ramon, all, Thanks for your comment. I'm agree with you and I just try to reactivate the debate too. IMHO, if we want PCE do a good job, i.e. not only finding the shortest path, but also the one which fit optimally the request we need first to compute the AS path to know with which

Re: [Pce] PCE and TED - was: Adoption of draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-06

2011-09-26 Thread Oscar González de Dios
de Olivier Dugeon Enviado el: lunes, 26 de septiembre de 2011 15:13 Para: Ramon Casellas CC: pce@ietf.org Asunto: Re: [Pce] PCE and TED - was: Adoption of draft-king-pce-hierarchy- fwk-06 Hello Ramon, all, Thanks for your comment. I'm agree with you and I just try to reactivate the debate too

Re: [Pce] PCE and TED - was: Adoption of draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-06

2011-09-26 Thread Dhruv Dhody
To: Olivier Dugeon; Ramon Casellas Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] PCE and TED - was: Adoption of draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-06 Hi Ramón, all... First of all, I would like to point out that we may differentiate several environments with different requirements for the multidomain

Re: [Pce] PCE and TED - was: Adoption of draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-06

2011-09-23 Thread Ramon Casellas
Dear Olivier, all Please see inline El 22/09/2011 18:22, Olivier Dugeon escribió: IMHO, I think that it is missing something in the different proposal to compute inter-domain tunnel. This is related to the TED. Indeed, there is no proposal to collect suitable information that could help