Dear PCErs,
The document has been updated to reflect your comments and has been posted.
In addition we included the comments on IANA allocation received post LC.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions/
There's
?
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: 2014年7月18日 22:22
To: draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensi...@tools.ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-09
I've reviewed this document
: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-09
I've reviewed this document for the WG last call.
I think this document is in good shape. I only found nits - see below.
Best regards
Jon
== Section 1.3 ==
Change
A new object type are introduced
, not 2.3
I agree,
== Section 5.5 ==
Value=q0 should be Value=10
Agree
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
Sent: 04 July 2014 17:05
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-09
should be to 2.5, not 2.3
== Section 5.5 ==
Value=q0 should be Value=10
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
Sent: 04 July 2014 17:05
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-09
Dear
