Re: [Pce] Urgent issue with draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce : PCE advising PCC about no path

2016-10-09 Thread Zhangxian (Xian)
Hi, Stephane, Olivier, All, I support the option 1 Dhruv proposed (see below), which has least impact on existing implementations. >(1) Allow Empty ERO to mean no path. >Let it be valid in all messages to mean that no intended path exists for this >LSP. >As per -16, >- empty ERO is added

Re: [Pce] Urgent issue with draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce : PCE advising PCC about no path

2016-10-09 Thread Dhruv Dhody
Hi Xian, I would avoid saying set of *paths* for delegated LSP, instead I would modify your text slightly as - The ERO may be empty if the PCE cannot find a valid path for a delegated LSP. One typical situation resulting in this empty ERO carried in the PCUpd message is that a PCE can no longer f